![]() |
|
working config for 32k context for Llama - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: LLM Models (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Forum: Open Weight (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +---- Forum: Local (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +---- Thread: working config for 32k context for Llama (/showthread.php?tid=27) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: working config for 32k context for Llama - rocmhouse90 - 08-30-2026 Quote:Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on 7900 XTX. I tested this tonight. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher. The main thing that moved was latency, not quality. Re: working config for 32k context for Llama - relayforge - 08-31-2026 Quote:Quote:Appreciate the detail. That matches what I saw on 7900 XTX. Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I ended up in about the same place using vLLM. Re: working config for 32k context for Llama - cozysmith - 09-02-2026 Good point. I ended up in about the same place using llama.cpp. Re: working config for 32k context for Llama - llmpeak - 09-05-2026 Quote:Good point. I ended up in about the same place using llama.cpp. Need a little more detail here. Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally? Re: working config for 32k context for Llama - bytehall - 09-05-2026 Did a small comparison this afternoon. The issue went away once I changed one setting and restarted the stack cleanly. The surprise was that memory pressure showed up before throughput collapsed. |