![]() |
|
70B still worth the pain - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: LLM Models (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Forum: Proprietary / Frontier (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=48) +--- Thread: 70B still worth the pain (/showthread.php?tid=1459) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: 70B still worth the pain - fastquill74 - 10-19-2026 That matches what I was seeing. I don't think your conclusion is far off. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. Re: 70B still worth the pain - macropoint - 10-19-2026 A couple things I'd check first. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Phi and compare from there. Re: 70B still worth the pain - kernelghost - 10-19-2026 I'd start with the simpler stack. Re: 70B still worth the pain - plaingarden18 - 10-19-2026 subscribed, curious where this lands. Re: 70B still worth the pain - phaseport36 - 10-19-2026 Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I ended up in about the same place using llama.cpp. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. Re: 70B still worth the pain - routerunner - 10-19-2026 following this because I'm in the same boat. |