![]() |
|
quant support gaps: what are you seeing? - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Inference Engines (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: TensorRT-LLM (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=37) +--- Thread: quant support gaps: what are you seeing? (/showthread.php?tid=1302) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: quant support gaps: what are you seeing? - routecrate - 10-19-2026 A couple questions before I guess too hard. Are you testing this on B200 or something else? Re: quant support gaps: what are you seeing? - kernelmike - 10-19-2026 Quote:Need a little more detail here. Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally? Good point. I don't think your conclusion is far off. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. Re: quant support gaps: what are you seeing? - northcraft90 - 10-19-2026 My first guess would be this: If you're on llama.cpp, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Not glamorous advice, but repeatable baselines save a lot of time. |