![]() |
|
working config for 32k context for FLUX - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: LLM Models (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Forum: Open Weight (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +---- Forum: Local (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=51) +---- Thread: working config for 32k context for FLUX (/showthread.php?tid=1294) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: working config for 32k context for FLUX - deltagrid - 10-18-2026 Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I ended up in about the same place using TensorRT-LLM. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. Re: working config for 32k context for FLUX - rocmcrate26 - 10-18-2026 Did a small comparison this afternoon. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher. The main thing that moved was latency, not quality. Re: working config for 32k context for FLUX - vectorport - 10-18-2026 I don't think that's the whole story. I wouldn't optimize around that first. On my side the bigger swing came from the runtime and not the model. Worth testing the simpler explanation before adopting the more interesting one. Re: working config for 32k context for FLUX - vramstream - 10-18-2026 following this because I'm in the same boat. |