![]() |
|
vision-language models on consumer gear with llama.cpp - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Generative AI (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +--- Forum: Video (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=70) +--- Thread: vision-language models on consumer gear with llama.cpp (/showthread.php?tid=1245) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: vision-language models on consumer gear with llama.cpp - rocmhouse90 - 10-19-2026 Quote:What worked for me was pretty simple. If you're on MLX, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. Interesting, I hadn't tried that. I don't think your conclusion is far off. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. Re: vision-language models on consumer gear with llama.cpp - cachelab - 10-19-2026 I'd approach it in a boring order. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with Mixtral and compare from there. Re: vision-language models on consumer gear with llama.cpp - visionforge - 10-19-2026 My first guess would be this: Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at NVFP4. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece. |