![]() |
|
4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants for Mixtral - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Hardware (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: GPUs (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=28) +--- Thread: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants for Mixtral (/showthread.php?tid=1133) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants for Mixtral - latentscope35 - 10-13-2026 I'd approach it in a boring order. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with DeepSeek and compare from there. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece. Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants for Mixtral - rocmriley - 10-13-2026 subscribed, curious where this lands. Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants for Mixtral - vrambandit - 10-13-2026 Thanks, that helps. I ended up in about the same place using LM Studio. I got better results once I stopped chasing one metric and just looked at whether the workflow felt usable. Re: 4090 vs 5090 for 70B quants for Mixtral - phasenode - 10-13-2026 What worked for me was pretty simple. If you're on Ollama, I'd confirm the version first and then reduce variables until the behavior is obvious. |