![]() |
|
prefix caching in llama.cpp - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Inference Engines (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Forum: llama.cpp / GGUF (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=35) +--- Thread: prefix caching in llama.cpp (/showthread.php?tid=1086) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - phasescope - 10-13-2026 Quote:A couple things I'd check first. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at small local stacks. A lot That matches what I was seeing. That matches what I saw on 7900 XTX. Re: prefix caching in llama.cpp - mangotinker73 - 10-13-2026 Quote:[quote]A couple things I'd check first. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at small local stacks. A couple things I'd check first. Before rebuilding anything, I'd test one clean baseline with DeepSeek and compare from there. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece. If you post your exact settings, people here can probably narrow it down pretty fast. |