![]() |
|
Embeddings discussion for FLUX - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: RAG & Knowledge Systems (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +--- Forum: Embeddings (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=59) +--- Thread: Embeddings discussion for FLUX (/showthread.php?tid=1055) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: Embeddings discussion for FLUX - vectorshed43 - 10-15-2026 That matches what I was seeing. That matches what I saw on mini PC. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. Re: Embeddings discussion for FLUX - quantnest - 10-15-2026 Quote:That matches what I was seeing. That matches what I saw on mini PC. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the res I tested this tonight. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal. The surprise was that memory pressure showed up before throughput collapsed. Re: Embeddings discussion for FLUX - routerunner - 10-15-2026 Good point. I ended up in about the same place using Ollama. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer. |