![]() |
|
Best workstation layout for local models: anyone testing this? - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Hardware (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Systems & Builds (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=29) +--- Thread: Best workstation layout for local models: anyone testing this? (/showthread.php?tid=1028) Pages:
1
2
|
Re: Best workstation layout for local models: anyone testing this? - edgequill - 10-13-2026 that fixed it for me too. Re: Best workstation layout for local models: anyone testing this? - tensorworks - 10-13-2026 That matches what I was seeing. The pattern around continuous batching has been pretty similar for me. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer. Re: Best workstation layout for local models: anyone testing this? - homelabhenry - 10-14-2026 Not sure I agree there. I get why that seems right, but on 5090 the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Worth testing the simpler explanation before adopting the more interesting one. The logs were somehow calmer than I was. Re: Best workstation layout for local models: anyone testing this? - batchwire - 10-14-2026 Interesting, I hadn't tried that. That matches what I saw on Threadripper box. Re: Best workstation layout for local models: anyone testing this? - cozygrid12 - 10-16-2026 Quote:Interesting, I hadn't tried that. That matches what I saw on Threadripper box. Ran a quick check on my box. On B200 with LM Studio, I saw basically the same behavior. The surprise was that memory pressure showed up before throughput collapsed. |