![]() |
|
distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: Harnesses, Agents & Orchestration (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +--- Forum: Agents (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=44) +--- Thread: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM (/showthread.php?tid=995) Pages:
1
2
|
distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - quiettoken - 10-10-2026 Curious what people here are seeing. I'm trying to decide whether to keep the current stack or change course. Main question is how people here are handling tokens/sec. Would appreciate practical advice rather than theory. This is mostly for local work rather than public serving. Re: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - plainember52 - 10-11-2026 What worked for me was pretty simple. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at tokens/sec. A lot of these threads end up being one bad config plus a pile of conclusions drawn from it. Re: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - vramridge - 10-12-2026 that fixed it for me too. Re: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - thetagrid15 - 10-12-2026 Need a little more detail here. Is this local-only or are you routing anything externally? Re: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - turboyard94 - 10-12-2026 That matches what I was seeing. I ended up in about the same place using SGLang. Worth rechecking your defaults though, because one bad assumption can make the rest of the thread look confusing. Re: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - quietstack - 10-12-2026 Not sure I agree there. I wouldn't optimize around that first. On my side the bigger swing came from the runtime and not the model. Worth testing the simpler explanation before adopting the more interesting one. Re: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - amberpatch25 - 10-12-2026 I tested this tonight. My result was mixed: first run looked bad, second run looked normal. I expected the model choice to matter more than it did. Re: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - turboyard94 - 10-12-2026 Good point. That matches what I saw on 7900 XTX. The biggest change for me was simplifying the stack instead of adding one more optimization layer. Re: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - quietstack - 10-14-2026 What worked for me was pretty simple. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at tail latency. Once you know the plain path works, then add the faster path back in piece by piece. Re: distillation that keeps useful behavior with vLLM - batchscope72 - 10-14-2026 I think the bottleneck is somewhere else. I've seen people blame tokens/sec when the real issue was much more mundane. |