![]() |
|
model fallback rules that work - Printable Version +- Inference (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference) +-- Forum: LLM Models (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Forum: Open Weight (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=49) +---- Forum: Recipes & Configurations (https://www.datasculpting.ai/inference/forumdisplay.php?fid=52) +---- Thread: model fallback rules that work (/showthread.php?tid=968) Pages:
1
2
|
model fallback rules that work - dockember - 10-09-2026 This keeps coming up in conversation so I figured I'd start a thread. The more I work with local setups, the more it seems like consumer GPUs decides everything downstream. Curious whether that lines up with what other people are seeing. Re: model fallback rules that work - kernelmike - 10-10-2026 A couple questions before I guess too hard. Do you see the same thing with a smaller batch or shorter prompt? Re: model fallback rules that work - llmarch51 - 10-13-2026 Good point. That matches what I saw on GB200. Re: model fallback rules that work - sparrowhall - 10-13-2026 Maybe, but I had the opposite result. The reported numbers can look compelling, but in ordinary usage I didn't see the same benefit. Re: model fallback rules that work - cozywire - 10-14-2026 I'd approach it in a boring order. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at tool calling. Re: model fallback rules that work - kernelpeak - 10-15-2026 A couple things I'd check first. Start by verifying the driver/runtime combo, then test with a smaller prompt, then look at KV cache pressure. Re: model fallback rules that work - batchshed - 10-15-2026 Not sure I agree there. I get why that seems right, but on Threadripper box the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Re: model fallback rules that work - vectorpoint - 10-15-2026 Did a small comparison this afternoon. I couldn't reproduce the slowdown until I pushed context much higher. Re: model fallback rules that work - cacheplane98 - 10-18-2026 Good point. I ended up in about the same place using TensorRT-LLM. Re: model fallback rules that work - batchsize - 10-18-2026 Quote:Good point. I ended up in about the same place using TensorRT-LLM. Maybe, but I had the opposite result. I get why that seems right, but on 7900 XTX the bottleneck felt elsewhere. Worth testing the simpler explanation before adopting the more interesting one. |